Re-thinking radio's digital future
British consumers have bought six million DAB radios because they want to listen to services which are not available on either AM or FM. It is a familiar argument and one that has become the mantra of countless analysts, consultants, broadcasters, regulators and journalists.
I have spread the same message through conference speeches, articles, e-mails and blog posts. But now we are all being asked to think again, as France questions whether listeners really do want more choice.
Although DMB audio is less efficient than DAB+, this is only a problem if your objective is to extend choice. But the GRN believes that French listeners are already well served.
"Significantly increased programme offering is not a strong consumer demand," says Radio France's Sylvain Anichini. "In France, there is already a very diverse offering in most places."
In Paris alone, listeners can tune into around 50 FM stations.
Anichini's comments come as France appears poised to adopt T-DMB technology for digital radio services, even though it was designed for mobile TV. It is an audacious move backed by the Groupement pour la Radio Numérique (Association for Digital Radio), a group of broadcasters whose members have more than 95 per cent of France's domestic audience.
GRN members have already started trial services in Paris, with a nationwide commercial launch planned for Christmas 2008. The French authorities will provide frequencies in the VHF (Band III) and Band L range.
The GRN is plumping for T-DMB, rather than DAB+, because its members believe that multimedia services will play an important part in the future of radio. Unless radio becomes interactive and adds pictures, they say, it will die a slow, but inevitable death.
"Digital radio cannot only be digital sound - it needs to have the right functionalities to compete with other digital offerings," says Anichini. These include a screen, rich data, synchronization between data and sound and high audio quality.
French broadcasters are worried they are failing to reach younger audiences, who prefer the Internet - Anichini claims that young people find radio "dumb" and "one-dimensional." It is a common concern across Europe, for both radio and TV.
Indeed, the situation may even be worse for TV since radio’s unique advantage is that you can listen to it whilst doing other things. The challenge facing mobile TV, in contrast, is to convince consumers that it is not a “sit-back” medium.
Nevertheless, the GRN perceives mobile TV as a real threat. For this reason, they argue not only that radio needs to be interactive and able to offer video, but also that it must be available in DMB-equipped mobile phones.
The GRN says that because T-DMB is part of the DAB family, the new French phones will be backwards compatible with DAB and DAB+. However, the inverse is not true.
Samsung will provide the phones. However, Nokia, which prefers the rival DVB-H technology, is unlikely to follow suit.
Instead, the Finnish giant is offering a free Internet Radio download for all Nokia phones running the Series 60 operating system. The service, which allows users to browse for radio programmes by genre, language, country, or name, will be installed on new phones.
The fact that GRN broadcasters are demanding more bits for DMB services will further restrict competition. However, Nokia's Internet Radio could have a significant Long Tail effect by allowing small stations squeezed out by the GRN a real opportunity to reach new audiences.
This leads us to the other question mark against the French strategy: is multimedia really the future of radio? Despite massive investment, commercial broadcasters in the UK have so far failed to launch any truly successful services.
Multimedia is undoubtedly a sexy addition to radio, but can it really compete with the sophisticated services already available on the Internet?
Many outside France, including foreign regulators and receiver manufacturers, have condemned the GRN’s controversial decision to adopt T-DMB for radio services. But different countries may have different needs.
In terms of the upper layers and legacy equipment, if you build a network capable of transmitting DMB audio, it is easy to convert it to deliver DMB video. However, if you build a DAB+ network, there is no migration path to "something better than radio" which includes video.
In the real world, there is no migration path from a multiplex which provides 50 DAB+ channels to one that gives you 50 T-DMB channels. Either you would have to drop some of the services, or you would have to build a new multiplex.
Although T-DMB is less spectrum efficient than DAB+, that is only a problem if you plan to launch new stations. In addition, French radio will require still more bits to provide the kind of interactive and video services being planned.
In the end, though, I suspect this is a question of culture and the depth of existing analogue services, rather than technology. Different choices - T-DMB or DAB+ - may be appropriate in different countries. Some countries may decide to complement "standard" DAB+ services with premium services on T-DMB.
[All changes to original text in Italics.]






Recent Comments