The long tail and international broadcasting
How do Swissinfo and other international broadcasters survive in a media jungle dominated by 900 pound gorillas like the BBC World Service? The answer is a strategy that takes full advantage of the "long tail".
Originally, the term was used to describe statistical distributions, such as the frequency with which different words occur.
For example, if you were to draw a chart based on the occurrence of words in the English language, the high end would be dominated by short and frequently used words like "the" and "have". Moving along the chart, you would see a long tail of increasingly obscure words that occur less frequently.
But it was Wired magazine editor Chris Anderson who first used the "long tail" to explain the success of Internet-based businesses such as Amazon.com. The idea is that the length of the tail can make niche products as lucrative as top sellers.
Music download services, for instance, make much more money from their entire catalogue than from just the top 100 bestselling titles. As demand increases for niche products, they become more profitable.
This is the argument behind Anderson's new book "The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More".
I believe the same thing is happening in broadcasting, where more platforms are increasing choice and fragmenting audiences. Thanks to Internet radio, podcasting and DAB, more broadcasters are able to cater to minority tastes.
Traditionally, international broadcasters have reached their target audiences via analogue shortwave radio, which is very much a hit and miss affair. Listeners tend to remain loyal to one brand name, such as the BBC WS or Deutsche Welle, because the radio dial is quite possibly the worst interface ever invented.
This is likely to change. Digital Radio Mondiale has the potential to bring the long tail model to shortwave broadcasting by making it easier for users to find new stations.
But let's get back to Swissinfo.
A few years ago, Swiss Radio International/Swissinfo provided a 24/7 world news service on shortwave. They had state-of-the-art studios and good journalists compiling very respectable news and current affairs programmes.
The only problem was a lack of evidence that anyone was actually listening. At least, that is what the Swiss authorities told SRI in 1997, when they hinted they might withdraw their half of the station's budget.
In the end, Swissinfo saved its lard/Speck/pancetta by going online and adopting a strategy of "Swissness". This meant no more international news and a back-to-basics mission of presenting Switzerland to the outside world.
The Internet did for Swissinfo what it had already done for Amazon: it enabled the Berne-based broadcaster to slash distribution costs and win a completely new audience. The focus on Switzerland means they are part of the long tail, providing a specialist news service that not even the BBC or CNN can match.
As Anderson argues in his book, a shift is taking place from mass markets to niche markets as Internet search engines aggregate less popular products and make them profitable.
The challenge for broadcasters is to ensure that their content is not too far down the tail and difficult to find. For websites, SEO is essential and is certainly a cornerstone of Swissinfo's strategy.
Elsewhere, other international broadcasters, including RFI, Radio Netherlands and Radio Prague are now getting together to look at ways of aggregating their content. Ideas under discussion include the creation of a common web portal.
I believe that the future of international broadcasters will depend on their success in driving demand down the long tail by making their content easier to find. Collaborative projects and cross-promotion will play a key part in this.


Recent Comments